The language used to describe a person who has experienced child sexual abuse is not neutral and can shape how their experience is understood by the public.
Some individuals prefer the term victim, as it accurately reflects that a crime was committed against them. Others identify more strongly with the term survivor, which emphasises resilience and life beyond the abuse. Preferences vary and may change over time, so sensitivity to this nuance is essential.
The term survivor is often used by advocacy groups and individuals to highlight strength, agency, and the ability to move forward after trauma. However, not everyone who has experienced abuse identifies with this term. When reporting, journalists should follow the language preferred by the individual being interviewed, rather than assuming which term is most appropriate.
The term victim is commonly used in legal, policy, and reporting contexts to describe a person who has been subjected to a crime. It can be an accurate and appropriate choice, particularly when discussing criminal acts, legal proceedings, or systemic issues. Care should always be taken to avoid language that questions credibility or assigns blame, and the term accuser should never be used.
